Comparative analysis of LED and traditional light source
Comprehensive performance contrast
| item | High press light | XT-LED street light |
| Photo-metric characteristic | bad | excellent |
| Heat dispersion | bad | excellent |
| Behaviour of electricity | Easy to get an electric (high pressure) | Safe (low pressure) |
| Working life | Short(5.000h) | Longer(>50,000h) |
| Working voltage | narrow | wide |
| consumption | higher | lower |
| Starting speed | Very slow(with 10 minutes) | Faster(2 s) |
| strobe | Have(exchange drive) | No (direct drive) |
| Bright dipping efficiency | Low(>60%) | High(90%) |
| Color rendering /distinguish | Bad(Ra>50,according to objects colors make people not true,dull,hypnosis) | Good(Ra>75,be colorful as object,real,make the person feel more comfortable) |
| Color temperature | Too lower(very yellow very orange，not fit) | Appropriate(comfortable) |
| Bad glare | Strong glare | No bad dazzling glare |
| Light pollution | strong | no |
| radiation | Serious(>300℃） | Cold light source |
| Black chimney | Easy(dust absorption) | No(anti-static) |
| Aging yellow lampshade | faster | no |
| Vibration strength | Bad( fragile) | Good(no lamp filament and glass) |
| Environment pollution | Lead pollution elements,etc | no |
| Maintain cost | high | lower |
| Product volume | bigger | Small(look super thin) |
| Product weight | heavy | light |
| Cost performance | bad | high |
| comprehensiveness | bad | excellent |
