Comparative analysis of LED and traditional light source
Comprehensive performance contrast
item | High press light | XT-LED street light |
Photo-metric characteristic | bad | excellent |
Heat dispersion | bad | excellent |
Behaviour of electricity | Easy to get an electric (high pressure) | Safe (low pressure) |
Working life | Short(5.000h) | Longer(>50,000h) |
Working voltage | narrow | wide |
consumption | higher | lower |
Starting speed | Very slow(with 10 minutes) | Faster(2 s) |
strobe | Have(exchange drive) | No (direct drive) |
Bright dipping efficiency | Low(>60%) | High(90%) |
Color rendering /distinguish | Bad(Ra>50,according to objects colors make people not true,dull,hypnosis) | Good(Ra>75,be colorful as object,real,make the person feel more comfortable) |
Color temperature | Too lower(very yellow very orange,not fit) | Appropriate(comfortable) |
Bad glare | Strong glare | No bad dazzling glare |
Light pollution | strong | no |
radiation | Serious(>300℃) | Cold light source |
Black chimney | Easy(dust absorption) | No(anti-static) |
Aging yellow lampshade | faster | no |
Vibration strength | Bad( fragile) | Good(no lamp filament and glass) |
Environment pollution | Lead pollution elements,etc | no |
Maintain cost | high | lower |
Product volume | bigger | Small(look super thin) |
Product weight | heavy | light |
Cost performance | bad | high |
comprehensiveness | bad | excellent |